Authentic Canteen Transactions To Improve Money-Value Equivalence In A Phase C Student With Intellectual Disability

Authors

  • Amalia Birahmatika Universitas Islam Nusantara
  • Lilis Suwandari Universitas Islam Nusantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71280/jotter.v4i1.618

Keywords:

Contextual learning, Money-value equivalence, Intellectual disability Phase C, Single subject research

Abstract

Phase C students with intellectual disability often struggle to understand money-value equivalence, a functional skill essential to independence in everyday transactions, because conventional instruction has not linked the material to real experience. This study examines the effect of contextual learning (CL) on improving the understanding of money-value equivalence in a Phase C student with an intellectual disability at SLB BC Murni, Bandung. The method used was single subject research with an A1-B-A2 design. Data were collected through a rubric-based performance test covering seven ability aspects and analysed using visual analysis within and between conditions. The results show that the subject's initial ability at baseline-1 was 52.4%, rising consistently to 61.9%, 81.0%, and 90.5% across the three intervention sessions, and reaching 100% at baseline-2 after the intervention was withdrawn, with a Percentage of Non-overlapping Data (PND) of 100%, indicating a highly effective intervention. The novelty of this study lies in separating the construct of denomination recognition from that of money-value equivalence, and in the use of an authentic transaction context rather than a classroom simulation, so that the skill is formed without an additional generalisation stage. The study concludes that contextual learning through graduated authentic shopping activities effectively improves and maintains the understanding of money-value equivalence in a Phase C student with an intellectual disability in a meaningful and applicable manner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD). (2021). Intellectual disability: Definition, diagnosis, classification, and systems of supports (12th ed.). AAIDD. https://www.aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition

Anderson, A., Rousey, J., Wall, E., Spooner, F., Bross, L. A., & Harris, R. (2024). Using community-based instruction with students with intellectual and developmental disabilities in today's classroom: A systematic review of literature from 2010–2023. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 59(4), 371–387.

Anditiasari, N. (2020). Analisis kesulitan belajar ABK (tuna rungu) dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika. Mathline: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v5i2.162

Ataviado, C. B., Frye, S. K., & Meyer, K. L. (2024). An educational money management program for undergraduate students with intellectual disabilities: A pilot study. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241308977

Bouck, E. C., Long, H., & O'Reilly, C. (2024). Learning to make change via virtual money manipulative, system of least prompts, and modeling online. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 39(3), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576241230924

Bouck, E. C., Park, J., & Stenzel, K. (2020). Virtual manipulatives as assistive technology to support students with disabilities with mathematics. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(4), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2020.1762157

Farhan, M. M., Mulia, D., & Sidik, S. A. (2024). Penggunaan pendekatan matematika realistik dalam meningkatkan kemampuan mengenal nilai uang anak tunagrahita kelas VII SMPKh. Jurnal UNIK: Pendidikan Luar Biasa, 9(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.30870/unik.v9i2.21949

Hidayah, M., Sujadi, I., & Pangadi, P. (2014). Proses berpikir siswa tunagrahita ringan dalam memecahkan masalah matematika bentuk soal cerita pada operasi hitung campuran. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/jmme.v4i1.9990

Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Kurniasari, Y. (2017). Pengaruh media count board terhadap peningkatan keterampilan penggunaan uang pada anak tunagrahita ringan kelas V SD Negeri Sarijadi 3 [Skripsi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]. Repository Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Ledford, J. R., & Gast, D. L. (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150666

Lestari, D., Sartinah, E. P., & Marufah, M. (2024). Pemanfaatan teknologi asistif kalkulator uang untuk belajar matematika bagi anak hambatan intelektual. GRAB KIDS: Journal of Special Education Need, 4(2), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.26740/gkjsen.v4i2.35322

Long, H. M., Bouck, E. C., & O'Reilly, C. (2024). Just dollars and cents: Making change via a virtual money manipulative. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 43(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705231216449

Maslakha, R. D., Khotimah, C., Widiawati, N., Zulfa, Z. S., Kartikasari, H. L., & Murni, A. W. (2026). Implementasi model contextual teaching and learning (CTL) melalui praktik jual beli untuk meningkatkan pemahaman nilai dan fungsi mata uang pada siswa kelas III SD Mojoruntut II. Journal of Science and Education Research, 5(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.62759/jser.v5i1.396

Masruroh, H. (2022). Teknik reinforcement untuk meningkatkan motivasi pada anak tunagrahita yang mengalami kesulitan (dyscalculia learning) di Sekolah Luar Biasa Negeri Banjarnegara. Studia Religia: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.30651/sr.v6i1.13173

Nisa, K., Ramadhani, N. F., & Zulmiyetri. (2021). Karakteristik dan hambatan belajar anak tunagrahita dalam pembelajaran fungsional. Jurnal Pendidikan Kebutuhan Khusus, 5(2), 88–96.

Normawati, Y. I., Ishartiwi, I., Mumpuniarti, M., & Maslahah, S. (2020). Development of functional academic guidebook based on experiential learning for teacher specialized in teaching children with intellectual disability. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 6(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.824229

Oktaviani, J. N., Susetyo, B., Homdijah, O. S., Nurhastuti, N., Fitriani, F., & Putri, T. D. (2023). Peningkatan pembelajaran matematika materi kesetaraan nilai uang melalui model pembelajaran project based learning bagi siswa tunagrahita. Jurnal Pendidikan Kebutuhan Khusus, 7(1), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.24036/jpkk.v7i1.892

Relingga, D. R., Frasida, S. A., & Ruby, A. C. (2025). Contextual learning with toy money media to improve the understanding of the money concept of students with mild mental disabilities. Jurnal Prajaiswara, 6(2), 641–647. https://doi.org/10.55351/prajaiswara.v6i2.185

Root, J. R., Cox, S. K., Hammons, N., Saunders, A. F., & Gilley, D. (2018). Contextualizing mathematics: Teaching problem solving to secondary students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56(6), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-56.6.442

Rustami, S., & Taufan, J. (2022). Meningkatkan kemampuan mengenal lambang bilangan 1 sampai 5 menggunakan media balok cuisenaire bagi anak tunagrahita ringan. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(3), 3947–3951. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2769

Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 21(3), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455980213004

Sismonita, T., & Marlina, M. (2024). Peningkatan kemampuan mengenal nilai mata uang melalui game edukasi dengan wordwall pada peserta didik tunagrahita ringan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Khusus (JUPPEKhu), 12(2). https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jupekhu

Somantri, T. S. (2018). Psikologi anak luar biasa (Cet. ke-5). Refika Aditama.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (Cet. ke-2). Alfabeta.

Sunanto, J., Takeuchi, K., & Nakata, H. (2005). Pengantar penelitian dengan subjek tunggal. CRICED, University of Tsukuba.

Susanti, R., & Ramadhani, N. F. (2024). Penyesuaian kurikulum dan lingkungan belajar bagi anak berkebutuhan khusus dalam pendidikan khusus. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Khusus, 10(1), 22–31.

Susetyo, B. (2021). Statistika untuk analisis data penelitian (Cet. ke-4). Refika Aditama.

UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education – All means all. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54676/JCSW3535

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30

How to Cite

Birahmatika, A., & Suwandari, L. (2026). Authentic Canteen Transactions To Improve Money-Value Equivalence In A Phase C Student With Intellectual Disability. Journal of Teacher Training and Educational Research, 4(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.71280/jotter.v4i1.618

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.