Reviewer Guidelines

1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions:
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and, through the editorial communications with the author, may also assist the author in improving the manuscript.
2. Promptness:
Each selected reviewer is expected to expedite the review process, thereby benefiting the publication and the author.
3. Objectivity:
Reviewers' reviews should be conducted objectively, expressing their analysis clearly with supporting arguments.
4. Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.