Verification Strategies and Independence: Cash Reader Use Among Students with Visual Impairment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71280/jotter.v4i1.626Keywords:
assistive technology, visual impairment, independent living skills, self-regulated learning, mobile applicationAbstract
Students with visual impairment face persistent difficulties identifying rupiah banknote denominations because their distinguishing features primarily rely on vision, tactile codes deteriorate through circulation, and personal folding strategies are ineffective when receiving change from strangers. This study examined the Cash Reader application as assistive technology for transaction activities and its contribution to learning independence. A qualitative descriptive design involved five totally blind students in grades X and XI at SLB Negeri A Citeureup Cimahi, representing all students who met the inclusion criteria and were selected purposively. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews addressing learning capability, application use, and constraints, then analyzed using Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña’s interactive model. Validity was supported through verbatim quotations with participant codes, explicit boundaries for findings not confirmed by every participant, and an auditable trail linking raw statements, categories, and conclusions. Findings showed that participants used the application situationally during real transactions through a controlled, non-continuous pattern and learned to operate it through peer networks rather than formal instruction. Its use supported self-regulated learning through self-regulation, metacognition, and problem solving, while strengthening confidence in everyday transactions. However, critical engagement with the application’s output varied among participants. Constraints included limited detection accuracy, dependence risk, and sensitivity to lighting conditions. Importantly, inaccuracies encouraged participants to develop personal verification strategies. Schools should therefore explicitly teach verification within daily living skills instruction, preserve foundational banknote-recognition abilities, and position assistive applications as complementary tools rather than complete substitutes for independent denomination-identification skills under diverse environmental and everyday transactional circumstances.
Downloads
References
Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal design for learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295
Alimović, S. (2024). Benefits and challenges of using assistive technology in the education and rehabilitation of individuals with visual impairments. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 19(8), 3063–3070. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2344802
Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English Linguistics Research, 3(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v3n1p39
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Csapó, Á., Wersényi, G., Nagy, H., & Stockman, T. (2015). A survey of assistive technologies and applications for blind users on mobile platforms: A review and foundation for research. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 9(4), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-015-0182-7
Fulvian, C. S. A., Ramadhani, K. N., & Sthevanie, F. (2025). Nominal classification of rupiah banknotes images using vision transformer. 2025 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications, 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1109/icoailo66760.2025.11155989
Griffin-Shirley, N., Banda, D. R., Ajuwon, P. M., Cheon, J., Lee, J., Park, H. R., & Lyngdoh, S. N. (2017). A survey on the use of mobile applications for people who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 111(4), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1711100402
Hafiar, H., Setianti, Y., Subekti, P., & Sani, A. (2020). Blind code pada uang kertas rupiah pesan komunikasi dan komunikasi pesan kepada publik disabilitas netra. Jurnal Kawistara, 10(3), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.48865
Hakobyan, L., Lumsden, J., O’Sullivan, D., & Bartlett, H. (2013). Mobile assistive technologies for the visually impaired. Survey of Ophthalmology, 58(6), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.10.004
Hartono, T., & Cahaya, F. R. (2018). The effectiveness of blind codes and security features for the blind and the prevention of fraud on the Indonesian rupiah. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 2(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfj.001.17.02.02.04
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge.
Martiniello, N., Eisenbarth, W., Lehane, C., Johnson, A., & Wittich, W. (2022). Exploring the use of smartphones and tablets among people with visual impairments: Are mainstream devices replacing the use of traditional visual aids? Assistive Technology, 34(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2019.1682084
Maxwell, J. A. (2009). Designing a qualitative study. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods (2nd ed., pp. 214–253). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n7
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sankhi, P., & Sandnes, F. E. (2022). A glimpse into smartphone screen reader use among blind teenagers in rural Nepal. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 17(8), 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1818298
Schalock, R. L., Luckasson, R., & Tassé, M. J. (2021). Intellectual disability: Definition, diagnosis, classification, and systems of supports (12th ed.). American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Schmidt, J. (2022). Cripping environmental education: Rethinking disability, nature, and interdependent futures. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 39(2), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2022.26
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Senjam, S. S., Manna, S., & Bascaran, C. (2021). Smartphones-based assistive technology: Accessibility features and apps for people with visual impairment, and its usage, challenges, and usability testing. Clinical Optometry, 13, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S336361
Tarsidi, D. (2012). Disabilitas dan pendidikan inklusif pada jenjang pendidikan tinggi. JASSI Anakku, 11(2), 145–152.
Verbrugge, L. M., & Jette, A. M. (1994). The disablement process. Social Science & Medicine, 38(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90294-1
Zajadacz, A. (2015). Evolution of models of disability as a basis for further policy changes in accessible tourism. Journal of Tourism Futures, 1(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/jtf-04-2015-0015
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fahri Algifari, Emay Mastiani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Similar Articles
- Labibah Alfiatin Nafi’ah, Maharani Desita Eka Cahyani, Ayasha Nabila Audiya Nency, Faizah Reva Abidah, Nazira Syifa Hadyan, Analisis Lingkungan Positif yang Mendukung Pembelajaran Pada Jenjang Sekolah Dasar , Journal of Teacher Training and Educational Research: Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Desember 2024
- Nuryadi Yadi, Aat Royhatudin, Muhamad Syara Nurhakim, KH. Hasyim As'ari's Concept of Adab Education As Foundation For Students' Learning Ethics , Journal of Teacher Training and Educational Research: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): August 2026
- Jaka Nugraha, Peran Guru PAI Dalam Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran PAI , Journal of Teacher Training and Educational Research: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Agustus 2023
- Erna Suryati, Hendri Abdul Qohar, The Effect of Coin Media on Addition Skills of a Student with Mild Intellectual Disability , Journal of Teacher Training and Educational Research: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): August 2026
- Riki Ruswandi, Wahyu Satya Gumelar, Rifqi Rayhani, Investigating Students’ Attitudes Toward Writing Assignments Through Social Media E-Portfolio , Journal of Teacher Training and Educational Research: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Agustus 2024
- Ajeng Yunica Hanifa, Wahyu Satya Gumelar, Andriana Gaffar, The Impact Of Experiential Learning To Improve Student's Ability In Reading Recount Text , Journal of Teacher Training and Educational Research: Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): April 2025
- Resa Anzela, Umar Rosadi, Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Audio Visual Terhadap Perilaku Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajajaran PAI , Journal of Teacher Training and Educational Research: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Agustus 2023
- Anton Prawito, Religious Literacy in the Social Media Era: Islamic Religious Education (PAI) Strategies to Combat Disinformation at Madrasah Aliyah Al Muslihun , Journal of Teacher Training and Educational Research: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Desember 2025
- Sopi Sopiah, Siti Latipah, Dwi Rahmawati, Eneng Metin Nuraeni, Muhamad Uli Nuha, Identifikasi Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII di SMP PGRI Cicalengka , Journal of Teacher Training and Educational Research: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Agustus 2024
- Septi Ernawati, Dwi Endah Pertiwi, Analysis of Assemblr Edu Media Use in Pre Reading Instruction Phase A Students with Intellectual Disabilities , Journal of Teacher Training and Educational Research: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): August 2026
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.





